![]() |
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/18...cs_steali.html Saturday, March 18, 2006 Marvel Comics: stealing our language Marvel Comics is continuing in its bid to steal the word "super-hero" from the public domain and put it in a lock-box to which it will control the key. Marvel and DC comics jointly filed a trademark on the word "super-hero." They use this mark to legally harass indie comic companies that make competing comic books. http://www.boingboing.net/2004/02/01...dc_claim_.html A trademark's enforceability hinges on whether the public is likely to associate a word or mark with a given company -- in other words, when you hear the word "super-hero," if you think "Marvel and DC," then Marvel will be able to go on censoring and eliminating its competition. One way of accomplishing this dirty bit of mind-control is by adding a T symbol after the word "Super-Hero." That TM lets the world know that you claim ownership over the word it accompanies. If you can get other people to do it, too, eventually you may in fact get the world to believe that the word is your property -- and then, it becomes your property. "Super-hero" isn't Marvel's property. They didn't invent the term. They aren't the only users of the term. It's a public-domain word that belongs to all of us. Adding a T to super-hero is a naked bid to steal "super-hero" from us and claim it for their own. The latest trick in its move to steal the word is using the T symbol in the bumpf for its California science centre show -- they've recruited a science museum to help them steal "super-hero." http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/17...superhero.html Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" to describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" -- as Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's reserve the term "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of comics published by companies that aren't crooked word-thieves. posted by Cory Doctorow at 11:45:11 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
| |||
| "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> wrote in message news:121r070q6qpvqb9@corp.supernews.com... | http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/18...cs_steali.html | | Saturday, March 18, 2006 | Marvel Comics: stealing our language | Marvel Comics is continuing in its bid to steal the word "super-hero" from | the public domain and put it in a lock-box to which it will control the key. | Marvel and DC comics jointly filed a trademark on the word "super-hero." | They use this mark to legally harass indie comic companies that make | competing comic books. | http://www.boingboing.net/2004/02/01...dc_claim_.html | | A trademark's enforceability hinges on whether the public is likely to | associate a word or mark with a given company -- in other words, when you | hear the word "super-hero," if you think "Marvel and DC," then Marvel will | be able to go on censoring and eliminating its competition. | | One way of accomplishing this dirty bit of mind-control is by adding a T | symbol after the word "Super-Hero." That TM lets the world know that you | claim ownership over the word it accompanies. If you can get other people to | do it, too, eventually you may in fact get the world to believe that the | word is your property -- and then, it becomes your property. | | "Super-hero" isn't Marvel's property. They didn't invent the term. They | aren't the only users of the term. It's a public-domain word that belongs to | all of us. Adding a T to super-hero is a naked bid to steal "super-hero" | from us and claim it for their own. | | The latest trick in its move to steal the word is using the T symbol in the | bumpf for its California science centre show -- they've recruited a science | museum to help them steal "super-hero." | http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/17...superhero.html | | Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" to | describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" -- as | Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's reserve the term | "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of comics published by | companies that aren't crooked word-thieves. | | | posted by Cory Doctorow at 11:45:11 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments http://superhero.biography.ms/ [clipped] Predecessors The origins of superheroes can be found in several prior forms of fiction. Many of their traits are shared with protagonists of later Victorian literature, such as Arthur Conan Doyle's detective Sherlock Holmes and H. Rider Haggard’s adventurer Alan Quatermain. The dime novel stories of Buffalo Bill, Zorro and Tarzan also influenced superheroes. Also, the pulp magazine crime fighters Doc Savage, The Shadow and The Spider were very direct influences. The rise and fall of the golden age of comic books In 1939, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster introduced Superman in Action Comics #1. Although the character was preceded by the costumed crime fighter The Phantom, featured in comic strips, Superman is considered the first superhero, introducing many of the conventions that have come to define the term including a secret identity, superhuman powers and a colorful costume including a symbol and cape. His name is also the source of the term "superhero." DC Comics (which published under the names National and American at the time) received an overwhelming response to Superman and, in the months that followed, introduced Aquaman, Hawkman, The Flash, Green Lantern, Batman, his sidekick Robin, and Wonder Woman, the first female superhero and the only significant one for quite some time. Although, DC dominated the superhero market at this time, Fawcett Comics rivaled their popularity with Captain Marvel, Marvel Comics found success with the Human Torch and Sub-Mariner, and cartoonist Will Eisner's The Spirit, a character with some superhero trappings who appeared in a newspaper comic insert, developed a loyal following. [end clip] |
| |||
| "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> wrote in message news:121r070q6qpvqb9@corp.supernews.com... | http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/18...cs_steali.html | | Saturday, March 18, 2006 | Marvel Comics: stealing our language | Marvel Comics is continuing in its bid to steal the word "super-hero" from | the public domain and put it in a lock-box to which it will control the key. | Marvel and DC comics jointly filed a trademark on the word "super-hero." | They use this mark to legally harass indie comic companies that make | competing comic books. | http://www.boingboing.net/2004/02/01...dc_claim_.html | | A trademark's enforceability hinges on whether the public is likely to | associate a word or mark with a given company -- in other words, when you | hear the word "super-hero," if you think "Marvel and DC," then Marvel will | be able to go on censoring and eliminating its competition. | | One way of accomplishing this dirty bit of mind-control is by adding a T | symbol after the word "Super-Hero." That TM lets the world know that you | claim ownership over the word it accompanies. If you can get other people to | do it, too, eventually you may in fact get the world to believe that the | word is your property -- and then, it becomes your property. | | "Super-hero" isn't Marvel's property. They didn't invent the term. They | aren't the only users of the term. It's a public-domain word that belongs to | all of us. Adding a T to super-hero is a naked bid to steal "super-hero" | from us and claim it for their own. | | The latest trick in its move to steal the word is using the T symbol in the | bumpf for its California science centre show -- they've recruited a science | museum to help them steal "super-hero." | http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/17...superhero.html | | Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" to | describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" -- as | Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's reserve the term | "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of comics published by | companies that aren't crooked word-thieves. | | | posted by Cory Doctorow at 11:45:11 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_hero Trademark status * The terms "Super Hero" and "Super Heroes" (and by association, "superhero"[1]) has been jointly trademarked by DC Comics and Marvel Comics (U.S. Trademark Serial Nos. 72243225 and 73222079). However, as an attempt to avoid the trademark, super-hero with a hyphen has sometimes been used as a generic spelling that covers all such heroes, not simply those owned by DC or Marvel. Trademark Serial Nos. 72243225 http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=88921m.2.1 Trademark Serial Nos. 73222079 http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=88921m.3.1 * As of March 2006, DC Comics and Marvel Comics were continuing their efforts to also trademark "super-hero"[2]. ================ Trademark Law: An Overview http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php/Trademark All About Trademarks http://www.ggmark.com/ ================ http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=88921m.2.1 Typed Drawing Word Mark SUPER HERO Goods and Services IC 025. US 039. G & S: MASQUERADE COSTUMES. FIRST USE: 19651029. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19660304 Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING Design Search Code Serial Number 72243225 Filing Date April 12, 1966 Current Filing Basis 1A Original Filing Basis 1A Registration Number 0825835 Registration Date March 14, 1967 Owner (REGISTRANT) BEN COOPER, INC. CORPORATION NEW YORK 33 34TH ST. BROOKLYN NEW YORK (LAST LISTED OWNER) DC COMICS, INC. CORPORATION ASSIGNEE OF NEW YORK 666 FIFTH AVENUE NEW YORK NEW YORK 10103 (LAST LISTED OWNER) MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. CORPORATION ASSIGNEE OF DELAWARE 387 PARK AVENUE SOUTH NEW YORK NEW YORK 10016 Assignment Recorded ASSIGNMENT RECORDED Type of Mark TRADEMARK Register PRINCIPAL Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 19870314 Live/Dead Indicator LIVE =================== http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=88921m.3.1 Typed Drawing Word Mark SUPER HEROES Goods and Services IC 016. US 002 005 022 023 029 037 038 050. G & S: PUBLICATIONS, PARTICULARLY COMIC BOOKS AND MAGAZINES AND STORIES IN ILLUSTRATED FORM [(( ; CARDBOARD STAND-UP FIGURES; PLAYING CARDS; PAPER IRON-ON TRANSFER; ERASERS; PENCIL SHARPENERS; PENCILS; GLUE FOR OFFICE AND HOME USE, SUCH AS IS SOLD AS STATIONERY SUPPLY;] NOTEBOOKS AND STAMP ALBUMS )). FIRST USE: 19661000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19661000 Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING Design Search Code Serial Number 73222079 Filing Date July 3, 1979 Current Filing Basis 1A Original Filing Basis 1A Published for Opposition June 9, 1981 Registration Number 1179067 Registration Date November 24, 1981 Owner (REGISTRANT) Cadence Industries Corporation a.k.a. Marvel Comics Group and DC Comics Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE 575 Madison Ave. New York NEW YORK 10022 (LAST LISTED OWNER) DC COMICS PARTNERSHIP BY ASSIGNMENT NEW YORK 1700 BROADWAY NEW YORK NEW YORK 10019 (LAST LISTED OWNER) MARVEL CHARACTERS, INC. CORPORATION BY ASSIGNMENT DELAWARE 10474 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD SUITE 206 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90025 Assignment Recorded ASSIGNMENT RECORDED Attorney of Record JONATHAN D. REICHMAN Type of Mark TRADEMARK Register PRINCIPAL Affidavit Text SECT 15. SECT 8 (6-YR). SECTION 8(10-YR) 20020819. Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 20020819 Live/Dead Indicator LIVE |
| |||
| George Johnson wrote: > http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/18...cs_steali.html > > Saturday, March 18, 2006 > Marvel Comics: stealing our language > Marvel Comics is continuing in its bid to steal the word "super-hero" from > the public domain and put it in a lock-box to which it will control the key. > Marvel and DC comics jointly filed a trademark on the word "super-hero." > They use this mark to legally harass indie comic companies that make > competing comic books. > http://www.boingboing.net/2004/02/01...dc_claim_.html > > A trademark's enforceability hinges on whether the public is likely to > associate a word or mark with a given company -- in other words, when you > hear the word "super-hero," if you think "Marvel and DC," then Marvel will > be able to go on censoring and eliminating its competition. > > One way of accomplishing this dirty bit of mind-control is by adding a T > symbol after the word "Super-Hero." That TM lets the world know that you > claim ownership over the word it accompanies. If you can get other people to > do it, too, eventually you may in fact get the world to believe that the > word is your property -- and then, it becomes your property. > > "Super-hero" isn't Marvel's property. They didn't invent the term. They > aren't the only users of the term. It's a public-domain word that belongs to > all of us. Adding a T to super-hero is a naked bid to steal "super-hero" > from us and claim it for their own. > > The latest trick in its move to steal the word is using the T symbol in the > bumpf for its California science centre show -- they've recruited a science > museum to help them steal "super-hero." > http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/17...superhero.html > > Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" to > describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" -- as > Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's reserve the term > "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of comics published by > companies that aren't crooked word-thieves. > > > posted by Cory Doctorow at 11:45:11 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments Looks like Marvel and DC are scared that they are losing control over the market. Still, this sort of maneuvering is not at all uncommon; Sega tried to trademark the word "hologram" in the early 1990s. Establishing legal control over a word that has been in the public domain for years is very difficult. -- [The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.] Richard Clayton "During wars laws are silent." -- Cicero |
| |||
| "Richard Clayton" <rZIGeclaZIGyton@verizon.net> wrote in message news:X%fTf.3007$vy.794@trnddc01... | George Johnson wrote: | > http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/18...cs_steali.html | > | > Saturday, March 18, 2006 | > Marvel Comics: stealing our language | > Marvel Comics is continuing in its bid to steal the word "super-hero" from | > the public domain and put it in a lock-box to which it will control the key. | > Marvel and DC comics jointly filed a trademark on the word "super-hero." | > They use this mark to legally harass indie comic companies that make | > competing comic books. | > http://www.boingboing.net/2004/02/01...dc_claim_.html | > | > A trademark's enforceability hinges on whether the public is likely to | > associate a word or mark with a given company -- in other words, when you | > hear the word "super-hero," if you think "Marvel and DC," then Marvel will | > be able to go on censoring and eliminating its competition. | > | > One way of accomplishing this dirty bit of mind-control is by adding a T | > symbol after the word "Super-Hero." That TM lets the world know that you | > claim ownership over the word it accompanies. If you can get other people to | > do it, too, eventually you may in fact get the world to believe that the | > word is your property -- and then, it becomes your property. | > | > "Super-hero" isn't Marvel's property. They didn't invent the term. They | > aren't the only users of the term. It's a public-domain word that belongs to | > all of us. Adding a T to super-hero is a naked bid to steal "super-hero" | > from us and claim it for their own. | > | > The latest trick in its move to steal the word is using the T symbol in the | > bumpf for its California science centre show -- they've recruited a science | > museum to help them steal "super-hero." | > http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/17...superhero.html | > | > Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" to | > describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" -- as | > Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's reserve the term | > "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of comics published by | > companies that aren't crooked word-thieves. | > | > | > posted by Cory Doctorow at 11:45:11 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments | | Looks like Marvel and DC are scared that they are losing control over | the market. Still, this sort of maneuvering is not at all uncommon; Sega | tried to trademark the word "hologram" in the early 1990s. Establishing | legal control over a word that has been in the public domain for years | is very difficult. | -- Man and Superman A Comedy and a Philosophy Bernard Shaw http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext02/mands10.txt CAMBRIDGE, MASS.: THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1903 NEW YORK: BARTLEBY.COM, 1999 Even the Copyright & Trademark on the word "Superman" is completely and utterly invalid. The actions of Marvel Comics and DC Comics in this whole inane mess is embarrassing and appalling. Their Trademarks are also, logically and obviously *NULL & VOID* pertaining to the rule of "Prior Usages" and "Common Generic Usages". ================ Übermensch From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9Cbermensch In Thus Spoke Zarathustra (in German, Also sprach Zarathustra), the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche argues that a man can become an Übermensch (help·info) (homo superior; the common equivalent English translation would be 'super-human'; see below) through the following steps: 1. By his will to power, manifested destructively in the rejection of, and rebellion against, societal ideals and moral codes; 2. By his will to power, manifested creatively in overcoming nihilism and re-evaluating old ideals or creating new ones. 3. By a continual process of self-overcoming. The Übermensch was contrasted by Nietzsche with the exemplar of the Last Man, who is the antithesis of the Übermensch. Whereas Nietzsche considered there to be no examples of an Übermensch in his time, he declared there were many examples of Last Men. [skipping down] Misleading translation The translation of Übermensch as "superman" may compound the misconception. Über can have a variety of meanings, as in Überwindung ("overcoming"), überstehen/durchstehen ("come through"/"get over"), übersetzen ("translate"/"take across"). Some scholars therefore prefer the translation as Overman, since the point of the Übermensch is that man needs to overcome himself. The German adverb "übermenschlich" is common and used in contexts such as "mit übermenschlichen Kräften gelang es ihm…": "with a force no human being is capable of he managed to…" or "with superhuman force…", the connotation is that of leaving the human sphere. Parallel constructions can be found in übernatürlich ("no longer natural", "transcendental"), überirdisch ("heavenly", literally "unearthly"). "Superman" lacks the German connotation of a sphere beyond human knowledge and power. In addition, Mensch is less specifically male than the English man, closer at times to the English human. Mensch is to be understood as a neuter form of a noun. ================== http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thus_Spoke_Zarathustra Thus Spoke Zarathustra From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the book by Friedrich Nietzsche. For the symphonic poem by Richard Strauss, please see Also sprach Zarathustra (Strauss). For the oil painting cycle by Lena Hades, please see Lena Hades. The cover for the first part of the first edition. Enlarge The cover for the first part of the first edition. Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None is a book written during the 1880s by the German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche. Hard to categorise, the work is a treatise on existential philosophy, a masterly work of literature, in parts a collection of poetry and in others a parody of and amendment to the Bible. Consisting largely of speeches by the book's hero, prophet Zarathustra, the work's content extends across a mass of styles and subject matter. Nietzsche himself described the work as 'the deepest ever written'. http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/1998 External links * Free eBook Thus Spake Zarathustra at Project Gutenberg—English The Thomas Common translation (available through the above link) is widely available, and a compelling rendition of the book. Some have claimed it to be inaccurate or to possess Nazi distortions by Nietzsche's sister; however, on comparison between it and the translations claimed to be superior, there is very little discrepancy in the meaning of the text. Modern translations by R.J. Hollingdale and Walter Kaufmann are sometimes considered to more accurately convey the minutiae of the German text. They are translations in which the work is rendered in a far more prosaic and mundane style of language. http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/7205 Free eBook Also sprach Zarathustra at Project Gutenberg (the original German version of the book) |
| |||
| "Richard Clayton" <rZIGeclaZIGyton@verizon.net> wrote in message news:X%fTf.3007$vy.794@trnddc01... | George Johnson wrote: | > http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/18...cs_steali.html | > | > Saturday, March 18, 2006 | > Marvel Comics: stealing our language | > Marvel Comics is continuing in its bid to steal the word "super-hero" from | > the public domain and put it in a lock-box to which it will control the key. | > Marvel and DC comics jointly filed a trademark on the word "super-hero." | > They use this mark to legally harass indie comic companies that make | > competing comic books. | > http://www.boingboing.net/2004/02/01...dc_claim_.html | > | > A trademark's enforceability hinges on whether the public is likely to | > associate a word or mark with a given company -- in other words, when you | > hear the word "super-hero," if you think "Marvel and DC," then Marvel will | > be able to go on censoring and eliminating its competition. | > | > One way of accomplishing this dirty bit of mind-control is by adding a T | > symbol after the word "Super-Hero." That TM lets the world know that you | > claim ownership over the word it accompanies. If you can get other people to | > do it, too, eventually you may in fact get the world to believe that the | > word is your property -- and then, it becomes your property. | > | > "Super-hero" isn't Marvel's property. They didn't invent the term. They | > aren't the only users of the term. It's a public-domain word that belongs to | > all of us. Adding a T to super-hero is a naked bid to steal "super-hero" | > from us and claim it for their own. | > | > The latest trick in its move to steal the word is using the T symbol in the | > bumpf for its California science centre show -- they've recruited a science | > museum to help them steal "super-hero." | > http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/17...superhero.html | > | > Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" to | > describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" -- as | > Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's reserve the term | > "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of comics published by | > companies that aren't crooked word-thieves. | > | > | > posted by Cory Doctorow at 11:45:11 AM permalink | Other blogs' comments | | Looks like Marvel and DC are scared that they are losing control over | the market. Still, this sort of maneuvering is not at all uncommon; Sega | tried to trademark the word "hologram" in the early 1990s. Establishing | legal control over a word that has been in the public domain for years | is very difficult. | -- Oh, and by the way, from the English translation of "Thus Spake Zarathustra" by Friedrich Nietzsche published 1887 Translated by Thomas Common PRIOR USAGE EXISTS! http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/1998 External links * Free eBook Thus Spake Zarathustra at Project Gutenberg—English QUOTH: Then will thy soul thrill with divine desires; and there will be adoration even in thy vanity! For this is the secret of the soul: when the hero hath abandoned it, then only approacheth it in dreams--the *** superhero **** .-- Thus spake Zarathustra. |
| |||
| "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> once tried to test me with: > Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" > to describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" > -- as Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's > reserve the term "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of > comics published by companies that aren't crooked word-thieves How about you just stop buying their comics, stop buying their graphic novels, stop buying their lunch boxes and halloween costumes, stop going to see their movies, and stop playing their video games. Didn't think you'd do that. -- Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer. |
| |||
| "Knight37" <knight37m@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns978CCB34F7483knight37m@130.133.1.4... > "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> once tried to test me with: > >> Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" >> to describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" >> -- as Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's >> reserve the term "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of >> comics published by companies that aren't crooked word-thieves > > How about you just stop buying their comics, stop buying their graphic > novels, stop buying their lunch boxes and halloween costumes, stop going > to > see their movies, and stop playing their video games. > > Didn't think you'd do that. I did. Haven't read a consistent, worthwhile Marvel comic in years. Well, except the movies. For a company that didn't know a decent production value if it bit them in the 70s-90s the X-Men and Spider-man franchises have been pretty good. I read mostly indie these days, so I have a small stake in this fracas. -- John Trauger, Vorlonagent "Methane martini. Shaken, not stirred." Vorlonagent (M), level 37 Blaster (Electric/Energy), Guardian RolIing Thunder (F), Level 35 Defender (Storm/Electric), Infinity Lemon Tree (F), Level 32 Scrapper (Spine/Invuln), Liberty Pulsar Staraven (F), Level 24 Controller (Grav/Rad), Liberty Fury- (F), Level 20 Brute (Energy/Energy), Liberty NightfalI (M), Level 19 Defender (Dark/Dark), Pinnacle Steel Night (M), Level 18 Tanker (Invulnerable/Super-Strength), Virtue lmpact (F), Level 18 Blaster (Gun/Energy), Virtue Faraday Facade (F), Level 18 Controller (Illusion/Forcefield), Justice Dr. Akagi (F), Level 18 Mastermind (Robots/Traps), Guardian L33t M4str (M), Level 17 Blaster (Gun/Devices), Liberty Luminant (F), Level 17 Defender (Rad/Rad), Victory Girl at the Bar (F), Level 17 Controller (Mind/Empthy), Triumph |
| |||
| "Knight37" <knight37m@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns978CCB34F7483knight37m@130.133.1.4... | "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> once tried to test me with: | | > Here's a proposal: from now on, let's never use the term "super-hero" | > to describe a Marvel character. Let's call them "underwear perverts" | > -- as Warren Ellis is wont to -- or vigilantes, or mutants. Let's | > reserve the term "super-hero" exclusively to describe the heros of | > comics published by companies that aren't crooked word-thieves | | How about you just stop buying their comics, stop buying their graphic | novels, stop buying their lunch boxes and halloween costumes, stop going to | see their movies, and stop playing their video games. | | Didn't think you'd do that. | | -- Have you ever figured that perhaps I don't mind MARVEL COMICS & DC COMICS being business-minded, but I do not tolerate unethical business practices which are ineptly crass while being legally indefensible. Seriously what sort of moronic business executives and incompetent legal representation even tries to claim exclusive usage to the word "Superhero" while so much PRIOR ART exists to refute this in a sneering laugh? An unethical business move like this reminds me of the time DC COMICS sued Fawcett Comics to stop Captain Marvel from outselling the Superman comics of the day. I do understand that DC COMICS is deciding to take a stab at Online Gaming using their character library, but frankly if they're going to make assholes of themselves in the process rather than deciding to fairly present a comparable quality product then I see no logical reason to fund their assholery. |
| |||
| "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> once tried to test me with: > Have you ever figured that perhaps I don't mind MARVEL COMICS & DC > COMICS being business-minded, but I do not tolerate unethical business > practices which are ineptly crass while being legally indefensible. > Seriously what sort of moronic business executives and incompetent > legal representation even tries to claim exclusive usage to the word > "Superhero" while so much PRIOR ART exists to refute this in a > sneering laugh? An unethical business move like this reminds me of > the time DC COMICS sued Fawcett Comics to stop Captain Marvel from > outselling the Superman comics of the day. I read this on Wikipedia - The terms "Super Hero" and "Super Heroes," and by association, "superhero"[6] has been jointly trademarked by DC Comics and Marvel Comics to describe entertainment on television, film, and printed media (U.S. Trademark Serial Nos. 72243225 and 73222079). Apparently they were granted trademarks on "Super Hero" quite a while back. That's just ludicrous. -- Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer. |
| |||
| "Knight37" <knight37m@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns978DDEF74657Dknight37m@130.133.1.4... | "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> once tried to test me with: | | > Have you ever figured that perhaps I don't mind MARVEL COMICS & DC | > COMICS being business-minded, but I do not tolerate unethical business | > practices which are ineptly crass while being legally indefensible. | > Seriously what sort of moronic business executives and incompetent | > legal representation even tries to claim exclusive usage to the word | > "Superhero" while so much PRIOR ART exists to refute this in a | > sneering laugh? An unethical business move like this reminds me of | > the time DC COMICS sued Fawcett Comics to stop Captain Marvel from | > outselling the Superman comics of the day. | | I read this on Wikipedia - | | The terms "Super Hero" and "Super Heroes," and by association, | "superhero"[6] has been jointly trademarked by DC Comics and Marvel Comics | to describe entertainment on television, film, and printed media (U.S. | Trademark Serial Nos. 72243225 and 73222079). | | | Apparently they were granted trademarks on "Super Hero" quite a while back. | That's just ludicrous. | | -- Yes, read my other posts on this subject here. I cover the prior art aspects and post the details. As for whom is the first official "Tights wearing" Superhero, that is "The Phantom" created prior to Superman. ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Johnson" <matrix29@voyager.net> Newsgroups: alt.games.coh Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 11:26 AM Subject: Re: MARVEL & DC COMICS are making ASSHOLES out of themselves *AGAIN* ================ http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=88921m.2.1 Typed Drawing Word Mark SUPER HERO Goods and Services IC 025. US 039. G & S: MASQUERADE COSTUMES. FIRST USE: 19651029. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19660304 Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING Design Search Code Serial Number 72243225 Filing Date April 12, 1966 Current Filing Basis 1A Original Filing Basis 1A Registration Number 0825835 Registration Date March 14, 1967 Owner (REGISTRANT) BEN COOPER, INC. CORPORATION NEW YORK 33 34TH ST. BROOKLYN NEW YORK (LAST LISTED OWNER) DC COMICS, INC. CORPORATION ASSIGNEE OF NEW YORK 666 FIFTH AVENUE NEW YORK NEW YORK 10103 (LAST LISTED OWNER) MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. CORPORATION ASSIGNEE OF DELAWARE 387 PARK AVENUE SOUTH NEW YORK NEW YORK 10016 Assignment Recorded ASSIGNMENT RECORDED Type of Mark TRADEMARK Register PRINCIPAL Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 19870314 Live/Dead Indicator LIVE =================== http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=88921m.3.1 Typed Drawing Word Mark SUPER HEROES Goods and Services IC 016. US 002 005 022 023 029 037 038 050. G & S: PUBLICATIONS, PARTICULARLY COMIC BOOKS AND MAGAZINES AND STORIES IN ILLUSTRATED FORM [(( ; CARDBOARD STAND-UP FIGURES; PLAYING CARDS; PAPER IRON-ON TRANSFER; ERASERS; PENCIL SHARPENERS; PENCILS; GLUE FOR OFFICE AND HOME USE, SUCH AS IS SOLD AS STATIONERY SUPPLY;] NOTEBOOKS AND STAMP ALBUMS )). FIRST USE: 19661000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19661000 Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING Design Search Code Serial Number 73222079 Filing Date July 3, 1979 Current Filing Basis 1A Original Filing Basis 1A Published for Opposition June 9, 1981 Registration Number 1179067 Registration Date November 24, 1981 Owner (REGISTRANT) Cadence Industries Corporation a.k.a. Marvel Comics Group and DC Comics Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE 575 Madison Ave. New York NEW YORK 10022 (LAST LISTED OWNER) DC COMICS PARTNERSHIP BY ASSIGNMENT NEW YORK 1700 BROADWAY NEW YORK NEW YORK 10019 (LAST LISTED OWNER) MARVEL CHARACTERS, INC. CORPORATION BY ASSIGNMENT DELAWARE 10474 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD SUITE 206 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90025 Assignment Recorded ASSIGNMENT RECORDED Attorney of Record JONATHAN D. REICHMAN Type of Mark TRADEMARK Register PRINCIPAL Affidavit Text SECT 15. SECT 8 (6-YR). SECTION 8(10-YR) 20020819. Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 20020819 Live/Dead Indicator LIVE |
| |||
| A good summary of the history of this and the actual legal facts of the case can be found here, btw: http://briefs.toddverbeek.com/archiv...nd_Marvel.html ( or http://tinyurl.com/g33c2 ) -R -- Rob Wynne / The Autographed Cat / doc@america.net http://www.autographedcat.com/ / http://autographedcat.livejournal.com/ Gafilk 2007: Jan 5-7, 2007 -- Atlanta, GA -- http://www.gafilk.org/ |
| Tags |
| assholes, comics, making, marvel |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTF comics the wharf rat: | EverQuest | 8 | 01-19-2007 02:05 AM | |
| GU Comics - WoW TSA rules DaFox: | WoW | 2 | 08-15-2006 06:04 PM | |
| Comics farming gold Lokari: | WoW | 16 | 07-18-2006 11:19 PM | |
| Ugh. More Flash Comics Joseph William Dixon: | Neopets | 1 | 09-01-2005 09:03 PM | |
| Re: City of Heroes: Marvel Comics sues NCSoft Nostromo: | City of Heroes | 17 | 11-16-2004 06:53 PM | |